Epstein’s Girlfriend Sparks New Twist, Says She Will Reveal the Truth Only If Trump Grants a Pardon

Fresh developments related to the Epstein files have once again triggered global outrage and curiosity. Although Jeffrey Epstein died in jail in 2019, questions surrounding his powerful network remain unanswered. Ghislaine Maxwell, his former girlfriend and close associate, is considered a key link to the truth. Investigators believe she has critical knowledge about Epstein’s contacts and operations. However, her latest stance has complicated efforts to uncover facts. Lawmakers and the public were hoping her testimony would bring clarity. Instead, her refusal has prolonged uncertainty.

How Did Ghislaine Maxwell Create A Deadlock?

According to a BBC report, Maxwell declined to answer questions from a US congressional committee on Monday. She stated clearly that she would cooperate only if she receives a presidential pardon from Donald Trump. Her condition effectively blocks the investigation. Maxwell’s move has added a political dimension to the legal process. It suggests that key revelations may now depend on executive intervention. Critics argue this sets a dangerous precedent. Supporters say it exposes flaws in the system.

What Happened During The Congressional Hearing?

Maxwell, 64, is currently serving a 20-year prison sentence for sex trafficking offenses. She was summoned by the US House Oversight Committee to testify about her relationship with Epstein. Appearing via video link from prison, she invoked the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution. This amendment protects individuals from self-incrimination. By using this right, Maxwell refused to answer all questions. Committee members were left frustrated. The hearing ended without any substantive testimony.

How Did Lawmakers React To Her Refusal?

Following the hearing, House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer expressed strong disappointment. He said Maxwell’s refusal was expected but deeply troubling. Comer described her as undeserving of any pardon. Democratic lawmakers went further, calling her a “monster” who should not be shown leniency. Several members said her silence continues to shield powerful figures. The committee said it had hoped to question her about Epstein’s crimes and possible accomplices. Without her cooperation, those answers remain out of reach.

What Did The Committee Chairman Say Publicly?

Speaking to reporters, James Comer said Maxwell’s actions were a setback. He confirmed that she relied entirely on the Fifth Amendment. Comer said the committee had prepared detailed questions about Epstein’s criminal network. He added that potential co-conspirators may never be exposed if key witnesses stay silent. The chairman said the committee will now explore alternative legal options. However, he admitted that Maxwell’s testimony would have been central to the investigation.

What Is Maxwell’s Legal Team Claiming?

Maxwell’s lawyer, David Markus, defended her position. He said Maxwell is willing to speak openly if she receives a pardon. Markus claimed this is the “only direct path” to the truth. According to him, a pardon would remove legal risks and allow full disclosure. He argued that both Congress and the American public deserve answers. His statement has fueled intense political debate. Many see it as an attempt to pressure the White House.

Why Is The Epstein Case Still So Sensitive?

Ghislaine Maxwell is the only person convicted in connection with Epstein’s sex trafficking network. Epstein himself died while awaiting trial, officially ruled a suicide. His death left many questions unanswered. Epstein was known to have links with powerful business leaders, politicians, celebrities, and academics. This has led to widespread suspicion and conspiracy theories. Maxwell is believed to hold information that could confirm or deny many allegations. Her refusal to testify means the full truth may remain hidden for years.