Press Enter to search
New Delhi: India stated that Pakistan’s nuclear secrecy is not new and has been questioned for decades. The MEA highlighted that Pakistan’s record includes smuggling, covert deals, and black-market networks. The AQ Khan episode is globally known and documented by international agencies. India said that it has repeatedly warned the world about these risks. The issue has resurfaced after Trump’s remarks brought new curiosity. India stressed that the global community should pay closer attention to Pakistan’s activities. The statement was calm but pointed, signaling strategic awareness.
President Trump said in an interview that countries like Pakistan are testing nuclear weapons. His remark immediately triggered speculation across international media and online platforms. The statement came without detailed proof, but its impact was significant. Because of Trump’s position, his words can influence diplomatic discussions. Some analysts believe he was hinting at intelligence inputs. Others argue it may have been a political message. But the fact remains that the comment has revived a sensitive subject.
Between April and May, several minor quakes hit areas near Pakistan’s border with Afghanistan. Their magnitude was close to the tremors recorded during Pakistan’s 1998 Chagai nuclear tests. This comparison led to speculation that underground tests might have occurred again. However, natural quakes in that region are also common. Scientists suggested that proper geological review is necessary. So far, no global scientific panel has reached a clear conclusion. But the timing of quakes and political statements has intensified suspicion.
Pakistan strongly denied conducting any new nuclear test. A senior Pakistani official stated that Pakistan was not the first to test in 1998 and will not be the first to test again. The statement emphasized a defensive posture instead of aggression. Pakistan said it remains committed to avoiding escalation in the region. However, experts note that denial alone cannot settle the debate. Transparency and international inspection play an important role. Pakistan has not shown willingness toward that level of openness.
India reminded the world that Pakistan’s nuclear program has a past linked to covert deals. From selling nuclear know-how to secret partners, its record is well documented. AQ Khan’s network was once considered the biggest illegal nuclear distribution system. India said these facts should be enough to raise serious concerns. It clarified that the issue is not new but part of a long pattern. The MEA stated that countries must act responsibly when dealing with nuclear capabilities. Stability in the region depends on transparency.
Pakistan has recently been trying to improve its relationship with the United States. Aligning closer to Trump was seen as part of a strategic reset. But this controversy may complicate that effort. Any suspicion around nuclear tests can make other nations cautious. Pakistan’s weak economy and internal instability already affect its global standing. Adding nuclear risks could worsen international trust. This situation puts Islamabad under pressure to clarify and prove its claims convincingly.
International nuclear monitoring agencies will likely observe this situation closely. Satellite data, seismic charts, and intelligence reports may offer clarity. If any secret testing took place, technical evidence will eventually emerge. Countries and organizations may demand deeper investigation. India has taken a balanced stance, neither escalating nor ignoring the issue. The global focus now shifts to transparent evaluation. The next steps depend on scientific data and diplomatic responses rather than speculation.