Pakistan Erupts As Law Takes To Streets, Uniforms Torn Over Munir’s Constitutional Immortality

International News: Pakistan is battling poverty and tension with India and Afghanistan, yet its leadership has chosen loyalty to the army over public welfare. A constitutional amendment, passed discreetly, has reportedly made Army Chief General Asim Munir untouchable. Lawyers claim that power has been shifted away from the judiciary into military hands. They say the move threatens Pakistan’s democratic structure.

Anger erupted in Karachi as legal professionals shouted that justice cannot be controlled by uniforms. Protesters believe the amendment could permanently silence court independence.

Why Were Uniforms Torn?

The confrontation intensified when lawyers clashed with police inside Sindh High Court premises. Local media reported that in the heat of the fight, some police personnel had their uniforms allegedly ripped apart. While officers attempted to calm demonstrators, they were forced to step back. Protesters said they were being stopped from defending the constitution. Police injuries were reportedly minor, yet the incident symbolized public frustration. Observers say such scenes reflect deep institutional crisis. The military’s dominance is now openly questioned on the streets.

What Did The Amendment Do?

The 27th amendment has created a new Federal Constitutional Court, seen by critics as an indirect replacement of the Supreme Court. Senior judges fear their authority is being diluted. Two judges resigned just hours after the amendment took effect. They argued that the change attempts to restrict judicial review over military decisions. Political analysts describes this move as an emergency shield for Munir. Opposition parties claim this amendment is not reform, but an enforced restructuring of state power.

Are Protests Limited To Karachi?

Demonstrations have spread from Karachi to other legal institutions across Pakistan. Bar associations are calling for nationwide resistance. Lawyers have announced partial strikes during court hours, blocking litigants from entering. Court proceedings were halted due to boycotts. Government representatives have avoided answering media questions on the issue. Protesters accuse the ruling class of bending constitutional values for military survival. Reports suggest similar dissent is growing within judicial circles in Lahore and Islamabad.

What Is Military’s Position?

The army has not officially responded to the lawyers’ allegations. However, sources close to defense circles say Munir’s elevation is aimed at maintaining stability. Critics react by asking whether democracy should be sacrificed for internal security. Many Pakistanis on social media demand clarity over why the amendment was urgently passed. Experts warn that if institutions collapse, public unrest may rise further. Analysts fear that Pakistan, already under IMF pressure, may fall into deeper political chaos.

Could This Spur Larger Unrest?

Lawyers say this is not a routine protest, but a historic warning. They underline that the constitution belongs to people, not generals. Some demonstrators held placards saying “We defend law, not rulers.” Police avoided escalation, possibly fearing international reaction. Activists believe granting Munir lifetime influence could set dangerous precedent. Many feel Pakistan is ignoring democratic standards under global observation. The situation may worsen if government refuses dialogue with legal bodies.

What Happens Next Politically?

Experts suggest that collapse of judiciary independence may trigger global concern. Diplomatic sources believe foreign governments could reconsider cooperation. Protesters plan to continue strikes until amendment is reviewed. Political analysts say internal protests may soon turn against the government itself. Lawyers warn citizens will suffer once army overrides justice. Pakistan’s credibility now depends on restoring constitutional balance. All eyes are on whether leaders choose dialogue or force.