US Court Intervenes to Save Migrants, Rips Trump’s Immigration Actions

International News: A US federal court has given an important verdict raising serious questions on the immigration policies of President Donald Trump and his administration. The court has termed the exile in some African countries, including South Sudan, illegal and inhuman. This decision came at a time when the lawyers of human rights organizations and migrants warned that the lives of dozens of people could be in danger due to exile.

Court strict on ignoring judicial order

In the verdict on Tuesday, US District Judge Brian E. Murphy clarified that the Trump administration, ignoring the prior orders of the court, deported migrants in unsafe areas such as South Sudan. Judge Murphy said that under American laws and constitutional rights, each person has the right to a fair hearing and legal process, which was sidelined in the case.

Claim of migrants' lawyers in emergency hearing

Lawyers who appeared on behalf of the migrants at the emergency hearing in the court on Wednesday said that about 12 citizens from Myanmar, Vietnam, and other countries can be forcibly deported by South Sudan, which is a war-torn and unstable country. The lawyers warned that the lives of these people could be directly threatened if they are sent there.

He claimed in court documents that some migrants were secretly deported, despite a judicial order passed during the Trump administration. This is not only a disregard of the law, but it is also a contempt of democratic and human values ​​of America.

"Violation of judicial process and ignoring human rights"

The lawyers argued that this type of exile is not only a violation of the basic principles of the judicial process, but it also violates the fundamental human rights of the migrants. He also said that immigration officials had prepared to forcibly deport these citizens without any information or hearing.

"If a person is deported without giving a chance to speak, it is directly against the constitution," the lawyers argued in the court.

Questions raised from the silence of Home Safety Department

The US Home Safety Department (DHS) has not yet given any official response to the matter. This silence has raised more questions about the intention and transparency of the administration.

Human rights organizations are demanding that the matter should be investigated freely and legal action should be taken against the officers who have ignored the court orders.

Trump administration's immigration policy once again in the dock

This decision has come up as another strict criticism of the Trump administration's immigration policy, which has already been protested against controversial actions like the "Muslim ban," "child detention," and "Mexico border wall."

Experts believe that this decision will not only set a legal example but will also play an important role in setting the outline of the US immigration policy in the coming years.

Humanity vs rigorous policies - what next?

Now the question is whether the US administration will adopt a human view, protecting the rights of migrants in the future, or whether innocent migrants in the mill of politics will continue to be ground.

This bold step of the federal court has come as a ray of hope for all who want to see America as a just and sensitive nation.