Press Enter to search
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday took serious note of the recent spate of rape cases in Delhi and questioned the Delhi Police and government over measures to ensure public safety. The court observed that the incidents point to concerns over law enforcement and public administration, particularly in public spaces.
A bench headed by Justice JB Pardiwala said places such as parks and public transport cannot become high-risk zones because of inadequate lighting, surveillance or other basic safety arrangements. The court also stressed that the right to live with dignity and without fear forms part of fundamental rights.
While taking note of the recent incidents, the bench said the situation brought back painful memories of the 2012 Nirbhaya case. The court raised questions about whether law-enforcement and public-safety mechanisms have made sufficient progress since then.
The court also said that expressions of concern or solidarity by public representatives are not enough and called for accountability and measurable action.
The court's intervention came amid reports of several serious sexual assault cases involving minors in Delhi in September. These included incidents reported in Swaroop Nagar, Deshbandhu Gupta Road, Sadar Bazaar and near Kalkaji Temple.
In the September 21 case, a 17-year-old girl was allegedly gang-raped at Aastha Kunj Park near Kalkaji Temple by three men who allegedly posed as police personnel. The incident prompted renewed concerns over the safety of public parks in the capital.
According to reports, the teenager had visited the Kalkaji Temple area with a male friend. The accused allegedly approached them while claiming to be police officers and separated the girl from her friend before taking her to an isolated location.
The case led to police action and further scrutiny of security arrangements around parks and other public places in Delhi.
Following the Kalkaji incident, the Delhi Lieutenant Governor ordered a safety audit of parks across the city. The exercise was directed to examine aspects including lighting, security, patrolling and cleanliness, while additional deployment of Pink Police personnel around parks was also ordered.
The Supreme Court emphasised that merely expressing concern over such incidents does not address the underlying problem. The bench called for a response that can be measured through concrete safety and enforcement measures.
The court's observations put renewed focus on the responsibility of law-enforcement agencies and civic authorities to ensure that women and children can access public spaces without fear.