Investigation Reveals Rift Between Attack Planners, Foiled Plot Modelled After Major Global Incident

New Delhi: Sources state that Dr Umar pushed for an aggressive terror strike in September, believing that timing held symbolic value similar to major past attacks. However, his intensity caused discomfort within the network. Officers say his impatience became a point of concern and generated tension. His behaviour created fear among members instead of confidence. This pressure gradually weakened unity inside the group. Experts believe that leadership based on fear often breaks under planning stress.

Why Did Ideologies Clash Internally?

Officials involved in the probe say that Dr Mujammil also supported extremist ideology, but he preferred a more cautious approach. His differ­ence in strategy often clashed with Umar's urgency. Both wanted to carry out an attack, but they could not agree on how and when. Umar wanted a dramatic execution while Mujammil focused on controlled planning. This difference widened with each meeting. Gradually the network started doubting the feasibility of Umar's strategy.

Did Disagreement Affect Planning Stage?

Investigation shows that target selection and timing led to serious disputes. Umar felt his ideas were strong, but his aggressive nature created mistrust. Mujammil feared that rash execution would expose the module early. This concern caused hesitation in finalising the plan. Members began distancing themselves from undesirable actions. Internal doubts delayed operational process. The disagreement finally prevented execution, according to intelligence inputs.

Was Leadership Control Challenged Within Group?

According to sources, a video shows Umar attempting to direct the team towards his preferred path. This was seen as an early sign of confrontation. His behaviour was considered dominating and emotionally unstable. Investigators believe this caused further fragmentation. Some members felt forced to follow, while others silently resisted. Lack of collective agreement damaged structure and momentum. This resistance ended in collapse of organisational unity.

Did Psychological Pressure Lead To Leak?

Reports claim that Mujammil started feeling overwhelmed when he realised Umar's aggressive intent was becoming evident. Already under stress regarding team unity, he allegedly leaked parts of the plan to a woman doctor. This leak reflected fear and desire to keep distance from internal chaos. It indicated lack of confidence in leadership. The action indirectly exposed details that hindered further progress. It ultimately weakened the entire module.

Was Large Scale Attack Realistic?

Interrogation findings point out that Umar frequently spoke of planning a massive attack in September to mirror ideological impact. However, his impatience and mental instability resulted in increased doubts. The team gradually lost trust in his capability. Without overall agreement, execution was impossible. Internal fractures proved stronger than the plan. The pressure eventually pushed members away from risky operations. Investigators believe this stopped escalation.

How Did Network Finally Collapse?

Officials conclude that internal rift prevented execution before law enforcement intervened. Tensions around approach, timing and method destroyed coordination. As disagreements deepened, the group struggled to maintain secrecy. Without unity, preparation slowed and monitoring increased. The plan never reached final stage. Investigators suggest that failure of trust and control made the plot unsustainable. The network collapsed internally before any real action occurred.