Will AI End the World by 2030? Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Says the Chance Is Zero

Washington: Amidst the rapidly increasing capabilities of artificial intelligence, i.e., AI, the question is constantly being discussed of whether this technology can become a threat to human existence in the future. Amidst this debate, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang has rejected the possibility of the world ending due to AI. In an ongoing excerpt from an interview with CBS News, Huang said the chance of the world ending due to AI by 2030 is 0 per cent.

What did Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang say?

Jensen Huang, regarding the possible 'doomsday' of AI, said that no matter how it is looked at, 2030 is not going to be the year of the end of the world. He clearly said that the probability of the world ending due to AI is 0 percent. His statement has come at a time when different opinions are emerging in the tech industry regarding the future of AI and the risks associated with it.

Huang says AI can be developed and used safely. He also did not support the idea of slowing down the pace of development of AI and said that the technology should advance rapidly. However, he also stressed that companies should not launch products in the market that are unsafe or not fully prepared.

What is the reason for fear about AI?

Concerns about AI are no longer just a matter of an imaginary future. In recent months, the increasing autonomous capabilities of AI agents and their unpredictable behavior have intensified the debate over security. In this context, 'recursive self-improvement', i.e. the ability of the AI system itself to improve the next generation system, is being discussed in the AI industry.

This means that AI models can play a greater role in the process of developing and improving their capabilities. Experts differ on how fast this process will proceed and how strong security measures will be required in the future.

Why did Dario Amodei express concern?

Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei appealed for caution regarding the pace of AI development in an article published in September 2026. He said AI's capabilities are growing rapidly and recursive self-improvement could surpass humans' ability to understand and control. He stressed the need to slow down the pace of increasing the capabilities of AI models.

Amodei also mentioned concerns like loss of control over systems, cyber attacks, biological threats and economic disruption among the potential risks associated with AI. However, these are risk estimates, not proof of any definitive prediction.

Are there differences of opinion regarding rules on AI?

There is no uniform opinion in the tech industry regarding the speed and security of AI. While Huang is calling for continued rapid development, some tech leaders like Amodei are calling for security measures to be put in place to keep up with the pace of AI's growing capabilities.

An important question in this debate is how fast AI should be developed and how safety standards should be implemented along with it. At present, extensive discussion is going on on this issue among tech companies, researchers and policymakers.

Could AI end the world by 2030?

Huang put this probability at 0 percent, but this is his assessment, not a scientifically proven prediction. On the other hand, some experts working on AI safety consider the potential risks of advanced AI to be serious. So the core issue of the current debate is not just whether AI will end the world or not, but also how to safely, control, and responsibly develop rapidly evolving AI systems.