Press Enter to search
International News: According to eyewitnesses, the Israeli airstrike targeted a bustling café in western Gaza late Sunday night. The café was filled with civilians watching a soccer match when the attack occurred. Shattered glass and smoldering debris covered the streets as survivors screamed for help. Emergency responders rushed to the scene amid chaos. It was one of the bloodiest single strikes in recent weeks. Medical sources from Al-Aqsa Hospital confirmed receiving more than 30 bodies, many of them burned beyond recognition. Dozens of others are said to be critically wounded. Paramedics described the scene as ‘unimaginable,’ saying the number of victims may still rise. Several ambulances had to make repeated trips due to the overwhelming scale. Doctors are urging international aid to prevent a total collapse of services.
Global reactions have started pouring in, with the United Nations expressing ‘grave concern’ over the civilian toll. Human rights groups are calling for an independent investigation into the incident. While the Israeli military claimed it was targeting Hamas operatives, no official evidence has been provided. Gaza authorities insist no militants were present at the café. The strike is expected to dominate upcoming UN Security Council sessions.
In a statement, the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) said the café was being used as a command center by suspected militants. The IDF emphasized its right to self-defense amid ongoing rocket fire from Gaza. However, it failed to provide concrete intelligence to back the claim. Critics argue the IDF’s ‘dual-use’ justification often masks civilian casualties. The spokesperson added that "measures were taken to avoid harm," though this remains disputed.
Residents in the neighborhood held mass funerals under heavy bombing threats. Grief turned to fury as survivors accused Israel of deliberately targeting civilians. A young boy holding his father’s bloodied shoe became a chilling symbol of the strike. Street protests erupted in Rafah and Khan Younis. Anger against Western silence was a recurring theme among mourners.
International law experts are now questioning whether the airstrike violates the Geneva Conventions. Striking a civilian location without immediate threat is seen as a possible war crime. Legal analysts say Israel may face growing ICC scrutiny. They also argue that using ‘dual-use’ labels to justify strikes is legally insufficient. Calls for accountability from rights organizations are intensifying.
Diplomatic sources say the strike will be tabled at both the UN Human Rights Council and International Criminal Court. Qatar and Turkey have already called for emergency sessions. Meanwhile, ICJ officials have requested video footage for preliminary assessment. The global community faces increasing pressure to act decisively. For Gaza, it’s another night of fear, fire, and forgotten humanity.