• Home
  • International
  • Imran Khan And Army May Seek Truce As Focus Shifts From Adiala To Kot Lakhpat Jail

Imran Khan And Army May Seek Truce As Focus Shifts From Adiala To Kot Lakhpat Jail

Fresh political signals from Pakistan suggest a possible thaw between Imran Khan’s party and the military, as reconciliation efforts intensify and attention shifts from Adiala Jail to Kot Lakhpat Prison.

Last Updated : Wednesday, 17 December 2025
Follow us :

International News: Former Prime Minister Imran Khan remains incarcerated amid mounting pressure on Pakistan’s political and military leadership. Khan has been held for months in multiple cases, ranging from corruption to national security charges. His continued detention has become a sensitive political issue. The government led by Shehbaz Sharif has faced criticism both domestically and internationally. Allowing Khan’s sister to meet him was seen as an attempt to ease tensions. Yet pressure continues to grow steadily.

What Role Does The Army Play In This Standoff?

Imran Khan’s fallout with Pakistan’s powerful military establishment is central to his imprisonment. The rift began during the tenure of former army chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa and deepened under current chief Asim Munir. Khan has openly accused the military of political interference. The army, in turn, views Khan as destabilizing. Despite this history, recent developments suggest both sides may be exploring a way out. Quiet backchannel talks are now being discussed in political circles.

Who Is Pushing For Reconciliation Talks?

According to a report by The News, senior figures linked to Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf are leading the effort. Former PTI leaders Fawad Chaudhry, Imran Ismail, and Mehmood Molvi are said to be actively involved. The initiative is reportedly operating under the banner of a “National Dialogue Committee.” Sources say the group is engaging with government ministers and influential figures close to the establishment. The goal is to reduce political confrontation quietly.

Why Is Kot Lakhpat Jail Now In Focus?

Earlier efforts centered on Imran Khan’s detention at Adiala Jail. However, attention has now shifted to Kot Lakhpat Jail. Several senior PTI leaders are currently held there, including Shah Mehmood Qureshi and Dr Yasmin Rashid. These leaders have publicly supported dialogue. They believe negotiations are the only viable path forward. Their stance differs sharply from Imran Khan’s earlier calls for street protests alone.

What Is The Strategy Behind This Shift?

Sources say the immediate goal is securing the release of PTI leaders from Kot Lakhpat Jail. The belief is that their freedom could reshape PTI leadership. The group pushing reconciliation feels these leaders better understand political realities. They are seen as more flexible and pragmatic. This, supporters argue, could open space for compromise with the military. It may also reduce political instability across Pakistan. The plan is being executed cautiously.

How Are Exiled Pakistanis Influencing Talks?

Overseas Pakistanis are reportedly playing a significant role in this effort. According to Fawad Chaudhry, several influential expatriates have joined the dialogue initiative. They are said to be exerting pressure for normalization. Sources claim these expatriates have promised investments worth up to one billion dollars if political stability returns. This economic incentive is seen as a major driver behind reconciliation efforts. The promise of foreign capital has caught the attention of policymakers.

Will Imran Khan Agree To Compromise?

This remains the biggest unanswered question. Imran Khan has previously rejected dialogue outright. From prison, he insisted that mass protests were the only solution. However, political realities may now be shifting. With senior PTI leaders backing talks and external pressure mounting, Khan may be forced to reconsider. Observers say even a limited understanding with the military would be historic. Pakistan now watches closely. Kot Lakhpat Jail, not Adiala, has become the new focal point of political change.