Press Enter to search
New Delhi: The central government has made a key statement in Parliament. It said there is no solid evidence directly linking high AQI to lung diseases. This reply came amid growing public concern. Cities like Delhi NCR face prolonged pollution. People fear long term health damage. Respiratory complaints are widely reported. The statement has surprised many health observers.
The reply was submitted in the Rajya Sabha. Minister Kirti Vardhan Singh answered a written question. He said no conclusive data proves a direct AQI-lung disease link. However, he admitted pollution can trigger breathing problems. The distinction was carefully worded. Officials stressed scientific caution. The response has political and medical implications.
The issue was raised by BJP MP Laxmikant Bajpai. He cited studies and medical tests. He asked whether dangerous AQI causes lung fibrosis. He also mentioned irreversible loss of lung capacity. His question reflected urban anxiety. Many residents share similar fears. The issue has been debated for years.
The MP also asked about lung elasticity loss. He suggested Delhi-NCR residents may have 50 percent reduced elasticity. The government said no confirmed data supports this claim. Officials avoided drawing direct conclusions. They emphasized lack of long-term verified studies. This has raised questions among doctors. Public health experts remain divided. Research gaps were clearly highlighted.
The government acknowledged pollution as a triggering factor. It linked polluted air to COPD and respiratory stress. But it stopped short of calling AQI a direct cause. Diseases like emphysema were mentioned indirectly. Officials stressed multi-factor health causes. Lifestyle and genetics were also implied. This cautious tone stood out. Critics call it defensive.
The minister highlighted ongoing health initiatives. Special training modules are being developed. These target doctors, nurses, and program managers. Frontline workers like ASHA staff are included. Traffic police and municipal workers receive guidance. Vulnerable groups like women and children are prioritized. The focus is on mitigation and awareness.
Pollution remains a sensitive urban issue. Government statements influence public trust. Denying a direct link may reduce panic. But it can also raise skepticism. Health activists demand clearer answers. Courts and policy makers are watching closely. Urban voters care deeply about air quality. The debate over AQI and health is far from over.