Press Enter to search
New Delhi: The State Investigation Agency carried out a search operation at the Kashmir Times office in Jammu following claims that the publication and associated individuals were promoting anti-national sentiments. Officials thoroughly checked the premises and examined all documents, computers and digital devices available. During the search, authorities allegedly found AK-series rifle cartridges, bullets for a pistol and some other materials.
All seized items have been taken into custody for investigation. This action has raised serious debates about whether media platforms are being excessively scrutinised in politically tense regions.
According to sources, the agency recovered rifle cartridges suspected to belong to AK-series guns and several pistol bullets from inside the office. They also collected digital media files and paperwork for deeper analysis. Officials have confirmed that the materials were seized only for verification and not as evidence of guilt at this stage. Authorities emphasised that the investigation is still ongoing and any future action will depend on final findings. This claim suggests that no immediate conclusions should be drawn based on early reports.
The raid comes after an official case was registered against Kashmir Times and a few associates over alleged involvement in activities considered harmful to national interests. The newspaper’s editor, Anuradha Bhasin, has previously been involved in legal petitions, especially after Article 370 was revoked in 2019. Her petition in the Supreme Court regarding communication blackout in Jammu and Kashmir had attracted widespread attention. Some believe her outspoken stance might have placed the publication under government radar. However, such direct links are yet to be proven.
Deputy Chief Minister Surinder Singh Choudhary stated that any action against media should only take place when charges are fully proven. He added that legal steps are necessary if someone violates norms but stressed that pressure-based or arbitrary actions must be avoided. His statement attempted to balance law enforcement with the importance of press autonomy. It also implies that government leadership wishes to distance itself from accusations of suppressing journalists through force.
Iltija Mufti, daughter of former Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Mehbooba Mufti, publicly criticised the raid through a social media post. She claimed that Kashmir Times is among the few publications that have consistently challenged authority. She argued that targeting it under the banner of national security is unfair. Her remarks questioned whether speaking truth could now be labelled anti-national. This reaction intensified conversations around shrinking space for independent journalism.
Several critics describe the raid as a sign of rising pressure on journalists operating in the region. They argue that such incidents discourage free reporting and weaken democratic voices. Supporters of the agency’s action claim that national security must remain the highest priority. They insist that investigations do not automatically mean suppression. The clash of views has reopened discussions about the real boundaries between security concerns and press freedom.
Officials have confirmed that all recovered items are under examination and no final decision has been made yet. Future steps will depend on whether any direct links to illegal activity are established. Meanwhile, public reaction and political statements continue to shape the narrative. For now, media organisations are closely watching how authorities proceed to understand the future implications of such actions.