Press Enter to search
National News: A statement made by India’s defense attache to Indonesia, Captain Shiv Kumar, has sparked a political controversy in India. Speaking at a seminar in Jakarta on June 10, Captain Kumar stated that the Indian Air Force (IAF) had lost some aircraft during Operation Sindoor, and he attributed the losses to restrictions imposed by political leadership.
Captain Kumar mentioned that Indian armed forces were under clear instructions not to target Pakistan’s military installations or air defense systems. He said, “We suffered losses only because we had explicit orders to strike only terror-related infrastructure.”
He further added that after these setbacks, the strategy was revised. Indian forces began by neutralizing enemy air defenses, which then allowed for more accurate and effective strikes using BrahMos missiles.
As the statement triggered a wave of political criticism back home, the Indian Embassy in Jakarta issued an official clarification. In a post on X (formerly Twitter), the embassy stated that Captain Shiv Kumar’s remarks had been taken out of context and misrepresented by the media.
“The primary intent of the presentation was to highlight that India’s armed forces operate under civilian leadership, which reflects the strength of our democratic framework,” the embassy said.
It also clarified that Operation Sindoor was specifically aimed at targeting terror-related infrastructure and not Pakistan’s military assets.
The Congress Party quickly turned the incident into a political issue. Party spokesperson Pawan Khera called it a "direct indictment of the Modi government" and demanded greater transparency.
Senior leader Jairam Ramesh questioned why Prime Minister Narendra Modi has not convened an all-party meeting and why the demand for a special parliamentary session has been denied. According to Congress, the government is allegedly afraid that revealing the truth could hold it accountable before the people of India.
Amid this controversy, an earlier statement by Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan has resurfaced. In that, he admitted that India did suffer some losses in the initial stages of Operation Sindoor. However, he strongly refuted Pakistan’s claims of having downed six Indian fighter jets, calling them "completely baseless and false."
General Chauhan had also emphasized that the focus should be on the reasons behind the losses, not just the fact that aircraft were lost.
This entire episode goes beyond a mere controversial statement. It brings to light the complex balance between military execution and political direction. While the government defends its decisions as prudent and measured, the opposition views it as a strategic failure and an attempt to suppress vital information.
In a region as sensitive as South Asia, the line between military preparedness and political restraint remains a delicate one—and debates like this one make that line even more visible.