Why Pakistan Sentenced Its Former ISI Chief To Fourteen Years Amid A Deepening National Power Struggle

Pakistan shocked many by sentencing former ISI chief Faiz Hameed to fourteen years. The verdict came fast. It listed multiple charges. Misconduct. Political involvement. Misuse of authority. Mishandling sensitive matters. The case shows how power works inside Pakistan. Nothing happens without a bigger reason behind it.

Was The Army Pushing Him Out Quietly?

Faiz Hameed was once close to Imran Khan. He was seen as the bridge between the government and the military. His influence grew quickly. Many officers felt uneasy. Some believed he wanted to become the next army chief. The climate changed. The system turned against him. Now the same establishment has punished him sharply.

Why Is This Case So Explosive Now?

The case goes beyond legal points. Old rivalries shape it. Power tensions shape it. The military remains Pakistan’s final authority. Anyone crossing that line faces consequences. Hameed faced questions over his political role. His Kabul visit made headlines. His tea-photo in Afghanistan went viral. It became his identity at a global level.

How Does Imran Khan’s Fall Connect Here?

Imran Khan and Faiz Hameed rose together. They fell together. Their partnership worked when the system backed them. When that support ended, both were isolated. Both were targeted. Imran landed in jail on political charges. Hameed now faces military punishment. In Pakistan, alliances are temporary. Power decides everything. This case is proof.

Was The Trial Fair Or Carefully Managed?

The army says the trial followed all rules. They claim he chose his own lawyer. They say he can appeal. But fairness is not the main question. The structure of military courts is. These courts usually support institutional agendas. Experts believe the outcome was decided long before the hearing ended. The process raised more doubts than trust.

Why Was The Verdict Timed For This Moment?

Pakistan faces economic stress. Political instability. Public anger. Foreign pressure. The military needs to show strength. Punishing a high-profile figure sends a message. It tells the nation that control remains with the establishment. The timing is designed to reinforce authority. It also warns other officers not to cross defined boundaries again.

What Future Does This Trial Signal For Pakistan?

This verdict shows how power operates in Pakistan. The military punishes anyone who steps outside its line. Imran Khan’s collapse was the first signal. Hameed’s sentencing is the second. More actions may follow. Institutions are fragile. Politics is unpredictable. Pakistan enters a new phase of uncertainty. And this verdict will shape its future for years.