Press Enter to search
International News:Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has stepped into the ongoing debate about peace efforts in Ukraine. Speaking on Friday, she said that if Donald Trump could stop the Russia–Ukraine war without putting conditions, she would consider nominating him for the Nobel Peace Prize. Her remarks come at a time when global attention is focused on Trump’s meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska.
Clinton was firm in her stand that no peace agreement should involve the exchange of territory. She made it clear that Ukraine must not be forced to give up its land to Russia in order to reach a settlement. According to her, rewarding aggression with territory would set a dangerous example for the world.
“Ukraine should not be compelled to surrender its land to an invading nation,” she said, stressing that international law and national sovereignty must be respected. Clinton’s warning came in response to Trump’s earlier suggestion that territorial compromise could be part of negotiations between Kyiv and Moscow.
Clinton also issued a strong caution regarding Trump’s interactions with the Russian leader. Referring to Putin, she said, “Trump knows he is meeting an enemy.” She added that the Russian president’s ultimate goal is to harm America and break apart the Western alliance, which includes NATO and its partners.
Her remarks were shared on X (formerly Twitter), where she emphasized that Putin cannot be trusted and that Trump must remain aware of his intentions. Clinton’s message was aimed not only at Trump but also at the American public and Western allies, reminding them of the risks of direct engagement with Moscow.
Donald Trump, who has been vocal about his ability to end the war quickly, had earlier mentioned that a land swap could be one of the possible solutions. However, he also stated that any final decision on such issues would rest entirely with Ukraine, not outside powers.
His comments drew mixed reactions worldwide. Some believe Trump’s approach could bring both parties to the negotiating table, while others fear that it could weaken Ukraine’s position and embolden Russia.
Clinton’s remarks have added a new dimension to the debate over peace in Ukraine. Supporters argue that she is right to insist on protecting Ukraine’s sovereignty, while critics say her comments were politically motivated, aimed at questioning Trump’s judgment ahead of his talks with Putin.
Nevertheless, her statement about a Nobel Peace Prize has caught global attention. It reflects both her skepticism about Trump’s ability to achieve peace and her recognition that such an achievement, if genuine, would deserve the highest international honor.
The Alaska meeting between Trump and Putin is being closely watched across the world. Many see it as a test of whether diplomacy can make real progress after years of conflict. Putin has insisted that Russia’s security must remain his top priority, while Ukraine continues to receive strong backing from the West.
If Trump manages to bring both sides closer to peace, it could reshape his political image and influence global power dynamics. But if talks fail, Clinton’s warning about trusting Putin may appear even more significant.
For now, the world waits to see whether Trump can deliver on his promise to “end the war quickly,” or if the conflict will drag on with even greater complexity.