Press Enter to search
National News: The Bihar assembly election has entered its decisive phase, and migrant voters have suddenly become the focal point of every political party. Nearly 50 lakh people who work outside the state are now being seen as the game changers. Their struggles, sacrifices, and presence back home during polls could tilt the balance in unexpected ways.
Political observers believe that their united voting pattern has the strength to reshape Bihar’s political map. For parties, this group represents both a challenge and an opportunity.
The Bharatiya Janata Party began early outreach to migrant workers across seventy cities, long before the campaign heated up. The party is banking on the portability of welfare schemes, showing migrants that government benefits reach them wherever they go.
Prime Minister Modi’s praise for Bhojpuri culture is also being interpreted as a direct message to the migrant population. BJP hopes that upper caste and economically stable migrants will vote solidly in its favor. The strategy is clear: appeal to national pride along with welfare promises.
Nitish Kumar’s Janata Dal United understands the power of migrants well. In 2005, this voting bloc was crucial in bringing the party to power. Today, JDU faces a tougher challenge in retaining their loyalty. The party is emphasizing stability, development, and continuity, urging migrants not to abandon the progress they claim to have delivered.
NDA allies are also using defense and security narratives, hoping that migrants working in border states will connect with issues of national strength and vote for them.
The Rashtriya Janata Dal has launched a direct attack, linking migration to government failure. The party argues that if jobs existed within Bihar, people would not be forced to leave. Their promise of “one government job for every family” directly targets migrants’ frustrations.
Congress has joined the chorus with “Stop Migration, Give Jobs” rallies, demanding employment creation. The opposition alliance is trying to project itself as the voice of dignity, social justice, and economic fairness. Migrants are central to their campaign message.
Experts warn against treating migrant voters as a single group. They are divided by caste, religion, and social affiliations, and political parties are tailoring messages accordingly. BJP is leaning on upper caste migrants, while RJD is depending on Yadav-Muslim alliances.
Each party is attempting to align migrants with their existing caste equations. This fractured voter base makes the competition unpredictable. The direction these migrants take could well determine who sits in Patna’s seat of power after the results.
The Election Commission has scheduled voting close to Diwali and Chhath, hoping returning migrants will remain in their villages to cast their ballots. But reality complicates this assumption. Staying back for additional days means loss of wages, something many migrant workers cannot afford.
The economic burden may discourage large numbers from voting. Without compensation or support, participation could shrink. Parties may try to provide incentives, but such practices raise serious questions about fairness and independence of the democratic process.
If wealthier migrants find it easier to vote while poorer ones are left out, the idea of equal democracy is weakened. Political leaders must ensure voting rights are not limited to rhetoric but practically guaranteed for every migrant. Otherwise, the gap between privileged and struggling voters will only deepen.
The migrant issue is more than just a poll tactic; it reflects Bihar’s long-standing employment crisis. Unless addressed sincerely, migration will remain both a political weapon and a social wound for generations.