Pragya Thakur Sparks Outrage With Threat To Break Daughters’ Legs Over Interfaith Visits

National News: Pragya Thakur's recent statements have sparked a new political controversy in the country. She said at a religious event that if a daughter goes to a non-Hindu's home, one should even consider breaking her legs. Her words shocked many and sparked a wave of protests. The Congress and the opposition have described this as inciting hatred and violence. People at the local and national levels have condemned this stance. This incident has also increased the feeling of fear in families and society. Legal experts are also questioning whether such statements are legally permissible.

Opposition to violence against children

Many senior leaders and social activists have stated clearly that parents should educate their children, not resort to violence and assault. The Constitution clearly protects children's rights and their physical safety. Psychologists and educators also believe that fear and punishment strain relationships and foster misunderstandings instead of communication.

The need for communication within families

Leaders and experts emphasized the need to foster a culture of dialogue and compromise within families. They also reminded that with the already rising number of complaints of violence against women in society, public figures are increasingly responsible for exercising restraint and refraining from making statements that justify violence.

Controversy over Pragya's statement

Pragya's supporters are arguing that her statement is about preserving family values. However, critics believe it promotes communalism and violence. A heated debate between the two sides is ongoing on social media, with several videos going viral, and experts say such statements can increase tensions in society.

Possibility of legal action

Legal experts have indicated that such controversial statements could lead to investigations and notices. In the election environment, this is also being linked to political gains and losses. The administration has also clearly stated that any form of violence will not be acceptable and may direct the police to remain vigilant.

Congress and opposition attack

The Congress party has questioned the central government and the BJP about whether the statement is part of the party's policy. They argue that promoting hate speech or inciting hatred against any community is against democratic values ​​and the Constitution. Several other parties have also demanded strict action and accountability.

Concern of the general public

There's also debate among people about how to balance discipline and children's freedom. Educators and social workers suggest that young people should be given the opportunity to express themselves freely and that families foster an atmosphere of trust. Legal recourse exists for breaking rules, but inflicting physical harm is a crime.

Lessons for society and politics

This controversy isn't just about a single statement, but also raises questions about societal values, constitutional limits, and the responsibility of leaders. Leaders in public life must tread carefully when speaking. Families must prioritize dialogue and understanding over rigidity. Only by respecting the nation's constitutional rights can children be guided on the right path.