Twisha Sharma Death Case: Madhya Pradesh HC orders Second Post-mortem; Husband Samarth Singh to Surrender

Bhopal: A significant development unfolded during the hearing at the Madhya Pradesh High Court regarding the case of actress Twisha Sharma. The counsel for the accused, Samarth Singh, decided to withdraw the anticipatory bail petition. During the proceedings, he informed the court that his client is prepared to surrender before the lower court. Consequently, the court's entire focus has now shifted to the petition seeking a second post-mortem examination, as the judge—acknowledging the urgency of the matter—stated that the demand for a second post-mortem must be heard on priority.

A heated debate ensued in the court regarding the demand for a second post-mortem. While the petitioner's counsel emphasized the necessity of a second examination, the opposing counsel vehemently opposed the request.

They argued that the initial post-mortem conducted by AIIMS was sufficient and that demanding a second examination amounted to an insult to the medical fraternity. They alleged that this demand served to cast doubt on the impartiality of the investigative process and expressed a lack of confidence in the competence of the doctors involved. However, following the arguments, the court granted its approval for a second post-mortem examination.

What arguments were presented in court?

Appearing on behalf of Twisha's mother-in-law, Giribala Singh, her counsel opposed the demand for a second post-mortem examination. They argued that a post-mortem had already been conducted by doctors at AIIMS and questioned the necessity of conducting yet another examination.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta defended the integrity of the doctors who had performed the post-mortem, while simultaneously stating that if the victim's family felt that any aspect had been overlooked, a second opinion could be sought. He remarked, "The impartiality of the doctors is beyond reproach; however, if the victim's family feels that something was missed, a second opinion may be obtained."

Opposing any further delay in the funeral rites, Giribala Singh's counsel further argued that the mortal remains should not be left to decompose. The lawyer said, "She was the daughter-in-law of our family. It is our duty to perform her last rites."