Maulana Fazlur Rehman Exposes Pakistan’s Afghan Policy, Says Army Sold Integrity For Dollars

International News: During a meeting with Pakistani traders, Maulana Fazlur Rehman openly criticised Pakistan’s policy towards Afghanistan. He said that for 45 years, those in power preferred personal gain over peaceful ties. Instead of building trust with Afghanistan, they acted only for profits. According to him, this failure has now become visible through rising market losses after the recent border conflict.

What Did He Say About The Dollar Deal?

Rehman claimed that two former military rulers, General Zia-ul-Haq and General Pervez Musharraf, weakened the policy by accepting money from the United States. In his words, Pakistan “sold its integrity for dollars.” He alleged that decisions driven by foreign funding harmed both national security and long-term relations with Afghanistan.

Why Did Traders Approach Rehman?

After border tensions last month, Pakistan stopped trade with Afghanistan. This decision directly damaged business sectors in Pakistan. Traders, facing heavy losses, approached Rehman and urged him to press the government for trade reopening. They highlighted that food supplies were affected, market prices were rising, and their businesses were collapsing.

How Has Trade Impacted Daily Life?

With movement halted across the border, Pakistan has witnessed skyrocketing prices of fruits and vegetables in several regions. Traders who used to earn well from exports are now unable to send goods. On the other hand, due to limited access to Afghan markets, poultry products are selling at lower prices, causing heavy losses to chicken suppliers.

What Is The Current Border Situation?

Reports confirm that tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan escalated after military clashes near the border last month. Both sides remain on alert, and cross-border movement is still limited. This disruption has directly hit markets and manpower-dependent transport businesses, putting them under financial pressure.

Did Rehman Blame Just One Government?

No. He said that both army-led and civilian governments made repeated mistakes over the decades. He believes that instead of focusing on peace and neighbourhood improvement, those in power looked at short-term benefits. He called the current situation a result of years of wrong decisions.

What Does This Mean For Pakistan Now?

Political experts say his remarks may deepen debate on military involvement in foreign policy. Traders believe his statement reflects public frustration. With high inflation and border blockage affecting daily earnings, people expect quick actions from the government. Many are now demanding that trade with Afghanistan resume without delay to prevent further economic damage.