Another Setback for Trump: Court Rules Against Fast-Track Deportation After Tariff Halt

International News: The US court has seriously challenged the fast-track deportation decision of US President Donald Trump. Washington DC District Judge Jia Cobb clarified that this policy implemented after January 2025 has violated the rights of immigrants. The court said that focusing only on deportation is to ignore the rights recognized under the Constitution.

The policy changed from January

Judge Cobb said that from January, the administration started the process of rapidly arresting immigrants and expelling them from the country. Those who do not have US citizenship and those who do not have minimum residence proof are immediately detained without lengthy investigation. The court called it against the fundamental rights under the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution.

Protection of constitutional rights is necessary

The court said that all immigrants have the right to a fair hearing. It is not right to focus only on rapid deportation, as it affects their freedom. The judge directed the administration that it is mandatory to follow constitutional protection while implementing the policy.

Administration prepares to appeal to Supreme Court

The Trump administration had appealed to the court to stay this decision, but the district court rejected it. The administration has said that it will now take the matter to the Supreme Court and try to get approval from the Supreme Court to implement the policy.

Earlier also, tariff policies were banned

Earlier also, the US court had declared the tariff imposed by Trump on foreign goods as illegal. The court gave the administration time till October 14 to remove the tariff or appeal to the Supreme Court. This continuously shows that some policies of the Trump administration are facing legal challenges.

Challenges of the coming time

This decision of the court has raised questions on the immigration policies of the Trump administration. Despite the argument of national security and economic interests, the court's stand is clear that violation of fundamental rights due to any policy will not be acceptable. Now it remains to be seen what decision the Supreme Court takes in this matter and what changes come in the US immigration policy.