Press Enter to search
The Bombay High Court has issued a landmark decision, declaring that a working woman is entitled to alimony after divorce. This ruling came while rejecting a petition from a man who refused to provide maintenance to his employed ex-wife, challenging the outdated notion that a job disqualifies a woman from financial support. The judgment, delivered by a bench led by Justice Revati Mohite-Dere, marks a significant stride toward gender equity in India’s legal framework.
The case hinged on the man’s argument that his ex-wife’s employment should exempt him from alimony payments, a stance the court deemed baseless. After a thorough review, the bench dismissed his petition, finding no evidence that her income fully met her needs. The court emphasized that a woman’s financial contribution does not erase her right to maintenance, setting a precedent that employment status alone cannot override alimony claims, thus protecting her post-divorce security.
The High Court clarified that a working woman’s earnings might not be sufficient for her maintenance, taking into account escalating living costs, healthcare expenses, and other personal obligations. The ruling stressed that alimony is designed to ensure a reasonable standard of living, not merely survival. By considering the marriage’s duration, the husband’s financial status, and the wife’s circumstances, the court established that income disparities and lifestyle needs justify support, offering a nuanced approach to the issue.
This decision is expected to empower working women across India to pursue alimony without fear of rejection based on their jobs. Women’s rights advocates have praised it as a progressive move, though it may prompt debates about the financial strain on men, potentially leading to further legal clarifications. As of today, the ruling has ignited discussions in legal circles, with calls for its principles to be adopted nationwide, shaping a more equitable future for divorce settlements.