'Saurav Das And Ashutosh Ranka Were The Real Leaders': Why Did Abhijeet Dipke Release A Late-Night Video?

According to sources, the case registered at Connaught Place police station related to entry without permission had already been sent to the crime branch.

Nishchay
Edited By: Nishchay
Share This:

Why Did He Call Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka the Real Leaders? (Facebook)

New Delhi: The investigation of two cases related to the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) protests has now been handed over to the Crime Branch. These cases relate to the protests at Connaught Place and Jantar Mantar in Delhi. Meanwhile, a video statement by CJP chief Abhijit Dipke has sparked a new controversy. He described Ashutosh Ranka and Saurav Das as the real leaders of the movement, after which a debate started on social media. As the controversy escalated, Deepke presented his side by releasing another video late at night.

Why was the investigation of both the cases handed over to the Crime Branch?

According to sources, the case registered at Connaught Place police station related to entry without permission had already been sent to the crime branch. Now the investigation of the second case related to the protests at Jantar Mantar has also been handed over to the Crime Branch.

Both the cases are related to CJP's protests. The investigating agency will now investigate the incidents and allegations related to these cases. However, the official reason behind handing over the investigation to the Crime Branch has not been made clear in the available information.

What did Abhijeet Dipke say about Ashutosh Ranka and Saurav Das?

CJP chief Abhijeet Dipke released a video of about 16 minutes on social media. In this he said that party co-coordinators Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka have played an important role in preparing the strategy of the movement and taking the demonstrations forward.

According to Dipke, people may consider him the face of the movement, but Ashutosh Ranka and Saurav Das have played an important role in the actual leadership of the protests. In his statement, he described himself as working as per instructions rather than considering himself the main leader of the movement.

After his statement came to light, the discussion regarding the leadership and responsibility of the movement intensified.

Why was there an uproar on social media over Dipke's video?

After the video surfaced, many users on social media raised questions on Dipke's statement. Some people alleged that he was putting the responsibility of the movement on other leaders to keep himself away from the controversy.

However, these are the reactions and allegations expressed on social media. These should not be seen as conclusions or established facts. Amidst the controversy, Deepke had to face criticism for his statement.

What clarification did Abhijeet Deepke give in the second video?

After the controversy over the first video increased, Abhijeet Dipke released another video on social media platform He tried to present his side through this video.

This entire incident has started a new discussion within the CJP regarding the leadership and responsibilities of the movement. On one hand, there is news that the investigation of both the cases has been handed over to the Crime Branch, while on the other hand, the statement of the party chief has created controversy in political and social media circles.

Now which aspects will be kept in mind in the crime branch investigation?

As the investigation into the Connaught Place and Jantar Mantar cases progresses, investigation into the related incidents and allegations lodged will be important. At this time, based on the available information, no final conclusions can be drawn regarding the results of the investigation or the legal responsibility of any individual.

Latest News

×