Press Enter to search
New Delhi: The Delhi government carried out cloud seeding trials this afternoon, with promises that rain would follow within minutes to hours. Officials had assured that specially equipped aircraft from IIT Kanpur would release flares into the clouds, prompting rainfall. However, as the hours ticked by, not a single drop fell from the sky. Residents looked up to see only clear skies, deepening doubts over whether the experiment was truly effective or just a publicity exercise. The promise of quick showers turned into frustration, fueling heated debate across the capital.
AAP leaders wasted no time in attacking the government. Saurabh Bharadwaj released a video, mocking the trial and calling it nothing short of fraud in the name of science. He claimed people were misled with promises of artificial rain, while taxpayers’ money was wasted on a hollow spectacle. His sharp remarks accused the government of hoping for divine intervention instead of real technology. The opposition’s response has turned the scientific experiment into a full-blown political controversy, making the issue trend far beyond technical discussions.
According to scientists from IIT Kanpur, the trial involved using a Cessna aircraft to release eight cloud seeding flares over key areas of Delhi. They had assured rain could occur between fifteen minutes to four hours after the process. Areas like Burari, Karol Bagh, Mayur Vihar, Bhojpur, and Khekra were targeted during the operation. The technique, known as pyrotechnic cloud seeding, was expected to convert moisture-laden clouds into rainfall. Yet, despite the scientific claims, the expected showers simply never came, leaving experts facing tough questions about credibility.
Cloud seeding is not new-it has been tried in several countries for decades. The idea is simple: sprinkle certain chemicals into clouds to trigger rain. But success depends heavily on the type of clouds and weather conditions. Experts admit the method works only when there are already rain-bearing clouds in the sky. Without the right conditions, the process can fail completely. This reality fuels arguments that governments are overselling the technology as a solution to pollution and drought, when in fact it remains unreliable.
Many weather analysts questioned why Delhi was chosen for the trials, given the city’s unpredictable skies during this season. Cloud cover was not ideal at the time of seeding, according to several meteorologists. They argue that spending crores on experiments without ensuring suitable conditions is a gamble at best. The government’s push for showcasing advanced technology may have ignored basic weather science. Critics now warn that such experiments risk eroding public trust in science, turning innovation into political theater.
For the Delhi government, the cloud seeding trial was meant to be a bold step in fighting pollution and water shortage. Success would have projected Delhi as a pioneer in artificial rain technology, earning political credit. Instead, the no-rain outcome risks embarrassment, with opposition turning it into a symbol of failed governance. Officials maintain that patience is needed, as weather science is unpredictable. But with mounting criticism and visible failure, the government faces a tough battle to defend the project.
Despite the setback, officials hinted that more trials could be conducted in the coming days. They argue that science needs multiple attempts to refine results and that one failure cannot define the project. International experts also back the idea that cloud seeding has a mixed record and takes time to prove its effectiveness. For Delhi, however, the public mood is sour, and patience thin. Whether the government dares to continue, or quietly shelves the idea, will decide if this rain experiment has a future.