One Negative Remark Can End a Judge’s Career: Gujarat High Court’s Stern Message

National News: The Gujarat High Court has ruled that even a single negative remark or doubt on a judge’s honesty is enough to send them into compulsory retirement. Delivering a strong message, the court said judges must always remain honest and uphold high moral standards because they hold a position of public trust. The order came on Tuesday while dismissing a petition filed by former judge J.K. Acharya, who was retired compulsorily in 2016 along with 18 other sessions judges.

'One Remark Is Enough, Proof Not Necessary'

The High Court stated that even on the basis of a judge’s general reputation, they can be compulsorily retired, even if there is no concrete evidence against them. The court emphasized that even a single confidential adverse remark or questionable integrity can form the basis for compulsory retirement. The decision is not influenced by promotions or benefits of a higher pay scale. The court also clarified that the Full Court of the High Court, which includes the collective opinion of all judges, is supreme in taking such decisions. Its review can only be done on limited grounds.

The Position of a Judge Represents Public Trust

The High Court, referring to a Supreme Court ruling, said that the position of a judge is symbolic of public trust. They must be impartial, intellectually honest, and possess high moral character. The court noted that for democracy and the rule of law to remain strong, it is essential for the judicial system itself to be strong. If any judge violates these standards, disciplinary action or compulsory retirement in public interest can be taken against them. The court further observed that in many cases, it is difficult to gather concrete evidence to prove questionable integrity, but the decision of the High Court’s administrative committee and Full Court is final.