'Oppression Will Lead to Jihad': Mahmood Madani’s Remark Sets Off Nationwide Debate

New Delhi: Madani, president of Jamiat Ulama‑i‑Hind, has said that if there is “pressure or injustice,” there will be “jihad.” Commenting on recent court decisions and policy changes, Madani alleged that the judiciary and the government have neglected the constitutional rights of the Muslim community and other minorities. 

Madani said decisions over the past few years have directly hurt the rights of minorities—such as decisions on temple-mosque, divorce, and waqf-related matters. He said that these decisions have broken the trust of those who believed in equal citizenship in the Constitution.

"Jihad"—What do Madani's words mean?

Madani clarified that his “jihad” does not mean violence but “struggle” against injustice. He says that his aim is to raise a voice against religious or social oppression and protect constitutional rights. “Jihad has always been about justice, not hatred or destruction,” he said. Criticizing the media and the government, he said that words like “love-jihad,” “land-jihad,” and “spit-jihad” are being misrepresented, due to which the Muslim community is being completely targeted.

Political reactions and discontent

As soon as Madani made this statement, political turmoil started. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has accused him of challenging the country's unity and constitutional institutions. BJP MPs and leaders have said that such statements can disturb social harmony in the country and have demanded the judiciary to take suo motu cognizance. A leader said, “If someone is challenging the Constitution and the courts, he will not be tolerated.” Opponents say such statements can fuel hatred and misunderstanding.

The depth of this controversy—what is the real issue?

Madani says Muslims and other minority communities no longer feel safe, as they feel their beliefs, identity, and religious freedom are under threat. He said that people are feeling fear and insecurity, and this situation can become a threat to the country. In their eyes, “jihad” is a warning—a way of saying that people will not remain silent if they are not kept within the bounds of the Constitution and the law.

The question is, comment or provocation?

The biggest question in this matter is how much discretion and sensitivity Madani's statement was made with. Did he violate the Constitution and democratic structure? Or was it just a warning, freedom of expression for justice?

The controversy has once again brought to the fore the complex challenges of justice, religious sensitivity, the Constitution, and minority rights in India.