Shah Rukh Khan Controversy: Sangeet Som Calls BCCI Move A Win For Sanatan Society

New Delhi: The issue that started with the auction of a player in IPL has now completely taken the form of politics and ideological conflict. The controversy gained momentum after SRK's team, Kolkata Knight Riders, bought Bangladeshi fast bowler Mustafizur Rahman. On one hand it is being said to be a decision of sports and professional contract, while on the other hand it is being linked to nation, faith, and emotions. This issue has become more sensitive amid the alleged atrocities against Hindus in Bangladesh. 

Why did sports decisions get linked to politics?

After KKR included Mustafizur Rahman in the team, some political leaders and religious organizations linked it to national interest. He says that buying a Bangladeshi player in the current situation gives a wrong message. Whereas cricket fans and franchise supporters are calling it a completely professional decision.

Why did Sangeet Som welcome the decision?

BJP leader Sangeet Som openly supported BCCI's decision. He described it as “respecting the sentiments of 100 crore Sanatanis.” Som said that this is a victory for the Hindus of all of India. Reiterating his earlier statements, he said that Shahrukh Khan must have understood that it is not right to clash with Sanatan Samaj while living in India.

Why was Congress's response balanced?

Congress leader Kapil Sibal adopted a restrained stance on this issue. He said that wherever there are atrocities against minorities, he condemns them. However, he refused to comment directly on the controversy.

Why is the anger of religious leaders increasing?

Many religious leaders have also jumped into this controversy. After Dhirendra Shastri and Swami Rambhadracharya, storyteller Devkinandan Thakur also made a scathing attack on Shahrukh Khan. He alleged that Shahrukh did nothing for the country but bought the Bangladeshi player. His statement further fueled the controversy.

Why did Nandkishore Gurjar's statement add fuel to the fire?

BJP MLA from Loni, Ghaziabad, Nandkishor Gurjar appealed to boycott Shahrukh Khan's films in a program. Using objectionable words, he accused the actor of anti-national mentality. There was a stir in political circles after this statement.

What did Rambhadracharya say?

Swami Rambhadracharya, who reached Nagpur, also targeted Shahrukh Khan. He said that Shahrukh is not a hero and his character is questionable. This statement further increased the voice of criticism.

Now in which direction will this dispute go?

After BCCI's decision, it has become clear that the matter is no longer limited to cricket only. Political statements, religious comments, and social media reactions are further complicating this. There is no official response from Shahrukh Khan or KKR management so far. At present, this controversy, which started from sports, has completely turned into a political debate.