Twisha Sharma Death Case: Accused Giribala's lawyer erupts in anger, abuses media after car runs over foot

New Delhi: A new development emerged on Friday in the case regarding the death of actress Twisha Sharma. During a hearing at the Madhya Pradesh High Court, the counsel representing Twisha's husband stated that his client is now prepared to surrender before the investigating agencies. It is reported that Twisha's husband has been absconding for approximately the past 10 days.

What did the counsel for the accused say?

During the hearing, the counsel for the accused also stated that the anticipatory bail petition filed in the High Court would be withdrawn. This statement has introduced a new twist to the case. Meanwhile, a video featuring Enosh George, the counsel for Twisha Sharma's mother-in-law, Giribala Singh, has also been making the rounds. He appeared visibly annoyed when questioned by the media and walked away without offering any response.

Why Did the Lawyer Lose His Cool?

The incident occurred when George Carlo—the lawyer representing Giribala Singh—was questioned regarding the death of Twisha. This line of questioning caused George Carlo to lose his temper. Right in front of the cameras, he lashed out at the media with harsh words. Simultaneously, he began violently pounding on his car. Shouting angrily, he demanded to know if there was any law mandating that every single detail be disclosed.

Did the Lawyer Welcome CBI Inquiry?

Advocate George Carlo has welcomed the decision to initiate a CBI inquiry. He further stated that the truth regarding the case must come to light. Carlo also noted that various rumors and speculations are currently circulating regarding this case, adding that the investigative agencies will now proceed to conduct their work in an impartial manner.

Why did Advocate Enosh George Get Angry?

While in the process of answering questions, the lawyer's foot was accidentally stepped on. This incident caused him to completely fly off the handle. He immediately began jumping up and down on the spot and violently banging on the hood of his car. A video recording of this incident has since surfaced.

Will the Accused Family's Troubles Escalate?

It is noteworthy that the difficulties facing Giribala Singh's family may now intensify. The government has officially recommended a CBI inquiry into the matter. Furthermore, the High Court has issued directives for a second post-mortem examination to be conducted on Twisha's body. Regarding Giribala Singh's bail plea, the High Court has issued notices to both the State Government and Giribala Singh herself. The next hearing for this case is scheduled for May 25.

Why Was Investigation Handed Over to the CBI?

Following Twisha Sharma's death, her family had alleged harassment and raised suspicions regarding the circumstances surrounding her demise. The case sparked considerable discussion and debate after it first came to light. Subsequently, the Madhya Pradesh government handed over the investigation of the case to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

Currently, the investigating agencies are examining digital evidence, witness statements, and other documents pertinent to the case. Officials have stated that the investigation is proceeding while taking all relevant aspects into consideration.

Has Twisha's husband agreed to surrender?

A major twist has emerged in the case involving the suspicious death of actress Twisha Sharma. During a hearing at the Madhya Pradesh High Court, the prime accused—and the deceased's husband—Samarth Singh withdrew his anticipatory bail plea and expressed his intention to surrender immediately. Arguing before the court, Samarth's counsel stated, "I will surrender immediately. I need to make arrangements for my wife's funeral."

During the High Court hearing, Senior Advocates Mrigendra Singh and Saurabh Sundar, appearing on behalf of Samarth Singh, submitted that their client no longer seeks anticipatory bail and intends to surrender before the lower court or the police to pursue the regular bail process.

In response, the Madhya Pradesh High Court granted Samarth Singh permission to surrender before the trial court or the Katara Hills Police Station. However, this move was opposed by Twisha's father, Navnidhi Sharma, and by the Solicitor General.

The Solicitor General, appearing on behalf of the State Government, strongly opposed this request. He argued before the court that a fugitive accused cannot be accorded the "luxury" of directly seeking relief from the High Court in a manner that could potentially influence the ongoing investigation. The SG contended that the police possess the full authority to interrogate and take the accused into custody.

He submitted to the court, "A fugitive accused should not be granted the luxury or privilege of an out-of-turn hearing in the High Court. The police require his custody in this matter."

In response, Samarth Singh's counsel argued that their client is currently facing a "media trial." He stated before the court, "We are neither terrorists nor influential figures. Such assertions are being made solely because this case has garnered significant media attention. Given the multitude of dowry-related cases that occur across the country, such remarks are not typically made in those instances."

What did the High Court say regarding the request to surrender?

During the hearing, the High Court observed that a chargesheet has not yet been filed in the case, and noted that in numerous such instances, the court has previously granted accused persons permission to surrender. The Court further clarified that if an accused individual surrenders before the remand court prior to the filing of the chargesheet, the concerned court is bound to issue a notice to the Investigating Officer. The State Government also stated that the police would seek the custodial remand of Samarth Singh to facilitate his detailed interrogation. The next hearing in the case is scheduled for Monday.

Was Approval Granted for a Second Post-mortem?

Concurrently, accepting the petition filed by Twisha's father, the High Court has granted permission for a second post-mortem examination of the deceased. The High Court has directed the State Government to airlift a special team of doctors from AIIMS, Delhi, to Bhopal specifically for this purpose. Previously, a lower court in Bhopal had rejected the request for a second post-mortem.

Notably, a heated debate ensued in the court regarding the demand for a second post-mortem. While the petitioner's counsel emphasized the necessity of a second examination, the counsel for the opposing party strongly objected to it.

Arguing against the demand for a second post-mortem, the counsel appearing on behalf of Twisha's mother-in-law, Giribala Singh, contended that a post-mortem had already been conducted by doctors from AIIMS; therefore, what was the need for yet another examination? He asserted that demanding a second post-mortem amounted to an insult to the medical fraternity. He argued that such a demand served only to cast doubt on the impartiality of the investigative process and to express a lack of confidence in the competence of the doctors.

Opposing any further delay in the funeral rites, Giribala Singh's counsel further argued that the mortal remains should not be left to decompose. The counsel stated, "She was the daughter-in-law of our family. It is our duty to perform her last rites."

Meanwhile, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta defended the initial post-mortem examination. However, he also added that if the aggrieved family felt that any aspect had been overlooked, a second opinion could be sought. He remarked, "The impartiality of the doctors is beyond reproach; nevertheless, if the aggrieved family feels that something has been missed, a second opinion may be obtained."