Why Justice Swaminathan Faces Impeachment Move After Temple–Dargah Lamp Order In Tamil Nadu Today

Justice G. R. Swaminathan allowed a centuries-old ritual. The lamp was to be lit on a pillar owned by a Hindu temple. That pillar stands near a dargah on a hilltop. He said the ritual would not harm anyone’s rights. He allowed only ten devotees under full security. He told police to ensure peace. His focus was on tradition and law.

Why Did The State Block The Ritual?

The Tamil Nadu government said this could create trouble. They claimed law and order might fail. So they stopped devotees from climbing the hill. People got angry and started protests. Hindu groups said their religious rights were denied. The government stood firm on its claim. The issue turned from legal to political very quickly.

How Did The High Court React Later?

A division bench supported Justice Swaminathan’s order. It said the state “wilfully” ignored the court. Strong words were used against officials. The bench repeated the same instructions. It showed that the order was lawful. Yet the government did not agree. This made the matter even bigger.

Why Is There Talk Of Impeachment Now?

Some MPs from the ruling party want impeachment. They say the order may disturb communal harmony. They argue the judge crossed limits. They want Parliament to act. Opponents say this is political revenge. They claim the judge simply protected a ritual. The debate has reached national level.

Who Is Justice Swaminathan Himself?

He is 57 years old. He belongs to Tamil Nadu. He has worked as a lawyer for many years. He became a High Court judge in 2017. He handles constitutional and public issues. His rulings are widely discussed. He has also given important judgments earlier. His retirement is due in 2030.

How Big Is This Controversy For Judiciary?

If impeachment moves forward, it becomes very serious. Judges may fear decisions on sensitive issues. Politics may start influencing justice. People may lose trust in courts. Religious matters are always emotional. Any wrong step can hurt harmony. This case tests India’s handling of diversity.

What Happens Next In This Battle?

The issue is now in Supreme Court. Parliament may take it up too. Ground situation is tense. Public opinions are divided. Judiciary insists its orders must be obeyed. Government insists security comes first. The final outcome will decide more than one case. It will decide how strong judicial independence remains.