Supreme Court Orders Stray Dogs Be Released After Sterilization, Returned to Original Spots; States Put on Notice

National News: The Supreme Court of India has issued a major order concerning the management of stray dogs. In its ruling, the court directed that all dogs currently kept in shelter homes must be released, but only after sterilization and vaccination. Dogs that are violent in nature or suffering from illness will remain in shelters to ensure public safety.

A three-judge bench headed by Justice Vikram Nath delivered the verdict, extending its directions not just to Delhi but also to every state and union territory. The decision is expected to bring uniformity in the handling of stray dog-related issues across the country.

Feeding Restrictions in Public Spaces

The apex court placed strong emphasis on controlling stray dog feeding in public areas. It ordered that each residential society or community must set up a specific feeding zone where dogs can be cared for. Feeding at roadsides, markets, and other common spaces has been strictly prohibited.

The court further noted that such practices often lead to inconvenience and safety hazards for citizens. It warned that individuals feeding dogs in prohibited areas could face legal consequences. Authorities have also been asked to establish a helpline number to allow people to report violations.

Stay on Earlier Delhi-NCR Order

With this new judgment, the Supreme Court has effectively suspended its earlier order from August 11, which required all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR to be moved into shelters. The bench observed that housing every dog in shelters is neither practical nor humane.

Instead, the court underlined sterilization and controlled relocation as the right approach, striking a balance between animal welfare and public safety.

Relocation to Original Habitat

The court also made it clear that once sterilization and vaccination are completed, dogs should be returned to the same areas from where they were picked up. This measure aims to prevent displacement, which could otherwise disturb the ecological and territorial balance of localities. At the same time, the ruling stressed that aggressive dogs and those suffering from diseases should not be released, as they may pose a danger to residents.

Need for a Comprehensive Law

Beyond immediate directions, the bench urged the central government to frame a nationwide law to deal with issues related to stray dogs. According to the court, the lack of a consistent legal framework has resulted in confusion and disputes between animal rights activists, residents, and authorities. Such a law, the judges suggested, should protect citizens from stray dog-related risks while also ensuring humane treatment of animals.

Balancing Safety and Compassion

This judgment reflects an effort by the Supreme Court to create a balanced approach—reducing the risks caused by stray dogs without resorting to harsh measures against the animals. By making sterilization mandatory, restricting feeding to designated spots, and calling for legal reform, the court has attempted to address a long-standing issue in a humane and practical way. Experts believe that if these measures are effectively implemented, they could set a model for managing stray animals across urban and rural India.