Pakistan’s Defense Minister’s Shocking Confession-Interfered in Afghanistan for 40 Years, Now Ends Intervention Policy

International News: Pakistan’s Defense Minister Khawaja Asif stunned observers by publicly admitting that Islamabad interfered in Afghanistan’s internal affairs for four decades. Speaking openly, Asif declared, “We interfered for 40 years, but this policy has now ended.”

His admission marks the first time a senior Pakistani leader has acknowledged such involvement. For years, global powers and Afghan leaders accused Pakistan of meddling in Kabul’s affairs, but officials always denied it. The new statement signals a rare moment of honesty that could reshape perceptions of Pakistan’s regional role.

Policy shift announced clearly

Asif made it clear that Pakistan will no longer interfere in Afghanistan. He emphasized that Islamabad holds no personal enmity with Kabul, adding, “We only fought on contract for others.” The comment was widely interpreted as a reference to Pakistan’s role during the Cold War and the war on terror. His words highlight a significant change from past strategies, where Pakistan was accused of backing armed groups and shaping Afghan politics. The announcement may be a signal of Islamabad’s intent to reset its troubled relationship with its neighbor.

Regional analysts react strongly

Experts across South Asia view this admission as a watershed moment in Pakistan’s foreign policy. For decades, instability in Afghanistan was linked to cross-border involvement by Pakistan’s military and intelligence services. Now, by admitting interference, Islamabad may be trying to defuse criticism and repair ties. Analysts believe the statement could also be an attempt to reposition Pakistan diplomatically, especially as it faces international pressure over its security policies. Still, the sincerity of the pledge remains under scrutiny, as trust in Pakistan’s intentions has been historically low.

Afghanistan’s long shadow of war

Afghanistan has suffered instability for decades, much of it worsened by external involvement. Since the Soviet invasion of 1979, Pakistan was accused of playing a dual role—supporting Afghan resistance while pursuing its own strategic interests. Later, Pakistan was seen as a key player during the Taliban’s rise. Asif’s admission validates many of Kabul’s long-standing complaints. Afghans have repeatedly argued that peace in their country depends on Pakistan ending interference. The statement, therefore, carries strong symbolic value, though its practical impact remains uncertain.

Implications for current politics

The confession comes at a time when Afghanistan is under Taliban control and struggling for stability. By declaring non-interference, Pakistan might be seeking to normalize ties with Kabul’s rulers and distance itself from accusations of proxy politics. The change could also be aimed at reducing international isolation and building credibility with global institutions. Yet, critics warn that words must translate into actions. Without visible policy changes on the ground, the declaration risks being dismissed as rhetoric rather than genuine reform.

A message to the world

Asif’s candid remarks may also have been intended for international audiences. Pakistan has faced growing criticism from the United States, Europe, and regional players for its role in Afghan instability. By admitting past mistakes, Islamabad could be trying to portray itself as a partner for peace. This message is particularly important as Pakistan seeks foreign investments and aid while battling economic difficulties. Demonstrating a break from old policies could help repair its tarnished global image, though skepticism remains high.

A cautious road ahead

While Asif’s statement has created headlines, the road ahead will be difficult. Afghanistan remains deeply fragile, with extremist groups still active and poverty widespread. For Pakistan, proving that it has truly abandoned interference will require consistent restraint and transparency. The confession is significant, but trust-building with Kabul and the wider international community will take time. If genuine, this could be the beginning of a new chapter in South Asian politics. If not, it risks deepening the mistrust that has haunted the region for decades.