Madani Questions Supreme Court Integrity And Sparks Debate Over Jihad And Vande Mataram Comment

New Delhi:  During the governing body council session of Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind held in Bhopal, Maulana Mahmood Madani made headlines by stating that the Supreme Court is working under government pressure. He argued that the court cannot be called “Supreme” unless it strictly follows constitutional limits. He referenced the Babri Masjid and triple talaq cases, claiming these decisions reflected political influence. Madani said that ignoring the Places of Worship Act while hearing disputes like Gyanvapi and Mathura raises serious concerns.

Did He Question Court’s Authority?

Madani stated that the Supreme Court has the right to be called “Supreme” only when it upholds constitutional boundaries without external influence. Otherwise, he said, its authority itself comes under question. These statements caused strong reactions in political and legal circles. He appealed to the Muslim community not to fall into despair, adding that disappointment is poison for any nation. The remarks have triggered a nationwide discussion over judicial independence and religious sentiments.

How Did He Define Jihad?

Speaking on jihad, Madani said that opponents of Islam have portrayed it as violence. He claimed terms like “love jihad”, “land jihad” and “spit jihad” are being used to insult Muslims. According to him, jihad in Islam is a sacred duty with different interpretations in the Quran aimed at human welfare and social justice. He emphasised that whenever oppression rises, jihad must follow. This statement received loud slogans of “Nara-e-Takbeer, Allahu Akbar” from attendees.

Who Can Declare Jihad Actually?

Madani clarified that jihad cannot be treated as personal revenge. He explained that only an Islamic government functioning under Sharia law can officially declare jihad. He pointed out that India is a democratic country without any such governance structure. Therefore, he said, debating jihad in this context is unnecessary. His remarks were intended to discourage individual actions and focus on moral resistance against injustice. However, critics argue the statement may still lead to misinterpretation.

What Did He Say On Vande?

On the issue of Vande Mataram, Madani said that dead communities surrender. If people are forced to chant “Vande Mataram”, he claimed some may comply without intent. He added that living communities confront circumstances instead of surrendering. This remark was widely criticised and described as provocative by many. The statement sparked debate over national symbols, patriotism and freedom of expression. Several leaders questioned whether his stance discourages unity.

How Did Muslim Groups React?

Following his comments, some Muslim organisations distanced themselves from Madani’s position. Jamaat-e-Islami Hind president Maulana Sadatullah Husaini said creating controversy over Vande Mataram is illogical. He stated that every citizen has the right to express patriotism as per personal belief. According to him, no single slogan or song should be imposed nationally. If someone wishes to show love for the country using Vande Mataram, they may do so, while others can choose their own form of expression.

Will The Debate Grow Larger?

Political experts believe Madani’s remarks could reopen sensitive religious discussions. Concerns are being raised over whether such statements may increase communal tension. Legal professionals have criticised his comments on the Supreme Court, saying they undermine judicial credibility. Meanwhile, Muslim groups appear divided on his views. Analysts warn that national-level issues like Vande Mataram and jihad need careful handling to avoid escalation. For now, reactions continue from various religious, social and political bodies.