New Delhi: Allahabad High Court has ruled that a Muslim man cannot claim the right to a live-in relationship, especially when he is already married. This decision highlights the complex interplay between religious law, social customs, and individual rights in India.Balancing constitutional and social moralityThe Court emphasized the need to balance constitutional morality and social morality when it comes to marriage. Allowing the live-in relationship, the Court argued, would disregard the established customs and potentially disrupt social order.Religious law takes precedenceThe Court cited the mans religion, Islam, which does not permit live-in relationships during a subsisting marriage. This reinforces the notion that personal laws hold weight in determining marital rights and obligations.Live-in relationship option exists for unmarried couplesThe Court acknowledged that unmarried couples may choose to live together, and their right to do so could be protected under Article 21 of the Constitution (guaranteeing Right to Life and Liberty). However, this was deemed inapplicable in this case due to the existing marriage and child.Wifes rights and childs welfare upheldThe Court prioritized the existing wifes rights and the well-being of the minor child. The live-in relationship, they argued, could jeopardize both.Misrepresentation of facts leads to further inquiryThe Court discovered inconsistencies in the mans claims about his wifes whereabouts, suggesting a potential attempt to mislead the court. This led to further investigation into the matter.Protected by the ConstitutionThis case underscores the multifaceted nature of live-in relationships in India. While the Constitution offers some protection, religious laws and social customs play a significant role. This decision clarifies that such relationships are not automatically recognized for married individuals governed by certain religious laws.
