RJD leader Abdul Bari Siddiqui says Tejashwi Yadav needs time to become ‘Jananayak’

Patna: In Bihar’s political circles, a new discussion has begun. Senior Rashtriya Janata Dal leader Abdul Bari Siddiqui has said that calling Tejashwi Yadav a “Jananayak”—or people’s leader—is a bit premature. His remark comes at a time when posters across the state are hailing Tejashwi as the new mass face of the RJD. Siddiqui, however, believes that such a title must be earned slowly through hard work and public connection, not through campaign material.

What was Siddiqui trying to say?

Speaking to reporters, the veteran leader reminded everyone that leadership is proven, not declared. “A people’s leader is one who stands with people in their pain, listens to them, and works for them year after year,” he said. Siddiqui added that Tejashwi is still in the early stage of his political life and has much to prove. He also mentioned that figures like Lalu Prasad Yadav and Karpoori Thakur didn’t get their reputation overnight—it came after long years of struggle and public trust.

Has Tejashwi lived up to his father’s legacy yet?

Siddiqui did not deny that Tejashwi is the natural heir to Lalu Yadav’s political base. But, as he put it, “inheritance and acceptance are two different things.” In his view, Tejashwi must build his own connection with the people if he wants to be seen as a genuine mass leader. Posters and slogans, he said, cannot create the bond that only genuine work can.

What was Tej Pratap Yadav’s response?

Tejashwi’s elder brother Tej Pratap Yadav also spoke on the matter. He said being called a “Jananayak” is not just about words—it is a serious responsibility. “The public decides who deserves that title,” he said. Many within the party see Tej Pratap’s reaction as an attempt to cool down the debate and maintain balance in the RJD camp.

Why is the word ‘Jananayak’ such a big deal in Bihar?

The title has a special place in the state’s political memory. It was once used for Karpoori Thakur, a leader remembered for fighting for social justice and equality. For Tejashwi’s supporters, using the same term connects him to that tradition. But for party veterans like Siddiqui, the comparison feels rushed. They believe such a label should come naturally from the people, not from campaign teams.

So, who really decides who’s a people’s leader?

Analysts say only the people can decide whether Tejashwi earns that respect. His performance as an opposition leader, his outreach to the youth, and his efforts in public service will shape how voters see him. Siddiqui’s comment, in a way, serves as a reminder to the party—real leadership is not printed on a poster; it’s built on years of consistent action.